Skip to content
confbooster
About the quiz

What this quiz is, and what it stands on.

Confidence is a crowded market and most of it is sold on assertion. Below: how this works in plain terms, then every source it leans on — with a sentence on each and a link you can follow.

One of those sections is deliberately uncomfortable. It holds the studies that killed techniques we would otherwise be able to sell you, and one review that undercuts the premise of the whole industry. A page listing only supporting evidence would be worth less than nothing.

23 sourcesLinks checked by hand

How it works, in plain terms

What it actually measures
Thirteen everyday situations — a Monday alarm, a message you need to send, someone praising your work — and what you do in each. We ask you to rate yourself exactly once, at the very end, and that number is deliberately kept out of the score: self-ratings are the least reliable input a quiz like this has. It is there so we can show you the gap between what you assumed and what your own answers said.
What you get at the end
Two things. A Confidence Index from 0 to 100, which is a reading of how you are operating right now rather than a verdict on you. And your dominant pattern — the tendency showing up most across your answers, out of Overthinker, Pleaser, Critic and Avoider.
Why four patterns, and why that is a simplification
Each one maps onto something psychologists have measured for decades: rumination, fear of negative evaluation, self-criticism, experiential avoidance. But traits like these sit on a continuum, so any four-way split is a convenience rather than a fact of nature. Most people show some of all four; the result names the loudest.
What it is not
Not a psychometric test, not a diagnosis, and not therapy. It has not been through formal validation — factor analysis on an independent sample, published reliability figures, evidence it correlates with established measures. Until that is done we call it an index, and nothing grander.

Where the model comes from

The quiz measures behavior rather than self-image, and the program is built around doing things rather than thinking about things. Both choices come from this work.

The four patterns

Each pattern in the quiz maps onto a construct psychologists have measured for decades. The names are ours; the underlying tendencies are not. Most people show some of all four — the result reports which one is loudest, not which box you belong in.

What actually has evidence behind it

These are the methods the 30-day program is assembled from. The effect sizes below come from trials that were usually run by clinicians with real support attached — a self-guided PDF should be expected to do less.

What the evidence does not support

This section exists because leaving it out would make the rest less trustworthy. Several popular confidence techniques did not survive scrutiny, and one well-known review undercuts the premise the entire self-esteem industry is sold on.

What the Confidence Index is, and is not

The index is a structured self-assessment. It has not been through the validation a psychometric test requires, and we would rather say so here than imply otherwise anywhere else.

What this means for what we promise

Reading the above honestly rules out most of what this market sells. We do not claim that feeling better about yourself will get you a promotion, a relationship, or a happier life — the evidence points the other way, and success seems to raise self-regard more reliably than self-regard raises success.

What we do claim is narrower and testable by you: fewer things avoided, less time lost to replaying conversations, decisions made faster, and a handful of things finally done that had been sitting for months. That is a smaller promise than our competitors make. It is also one we can defend.

Thirty days starts the change. It does not finish it — the habit-formation work above puts the median nearer sixty-six days, with a range wide enough that averages are close to useless for any one person.

The Confidence Index is a structured self-assessment, not a psychometric test and not a diagnosis. Turning it into one would mean factor analysis on an independent sample, published reliability figures, and evidence that it correlates with established measures in the directions you would expect. None of that is done yet, so we call it an index and nothing grander.

Your dominant pattern is the loudest of four tendencies, not a personality type. Most people show some of all four, and where you land can move over time.

Listing a paper here says nothing about its authors. None of the researchers cited are connected to Confbooster, and none of them endorse it. Spotted something we have got wrong? Write to hello@confbooster.com — corrections get made.